From the founding of our nation until quite recently, the U.S.
and its citizens were regarded, at home and abroad, as exceptional in a number
of deep and important respects. One of these was their fierce and principled
independence, which informed not only the design of the political experiment
that is the U.S.
Constitution but also their approach to everyday affairs. The proud
self-reliance that struck Alexis de Tocqueville in his visit to the U.S. in the
early 1830s extended to personal finances. The American
"individualism" about which he wrote did not exclude social
cooperation—the young nation was a hotbed of civic associations and voluntary
organizations. But in an environment bursting with opportunity, American men
and women viewed themselves as accountable for their own situation through
their own achievements—a novel outlook at that time, markedly different from
the prevailing attitudes of the Old World (or
at least the Continent). The corollaries of this American ethos were, on the
one hand, an affinity for personal enterprise and industry and, on the other, a
horror of dependency and contempt for anything that smacked of a mendicant
mentality. Although many Americans in earlier times were poor, even people in
fairly desperate circumstances were known to refuse help or handouts as an
affront to their dignity and independence. People who subsisted on public
resources were known as "paupers," and provision for them was a local
undertaking. Neither beneficiaries nor recipients held the condition of
pauperism in high regard.
TheU.S.
is now on the verge of a symbolic threshold: the point at which more than half
of all American households receive and accept transfer benefits from the
government. (DWD-Compared to about 30% in 1980) From cradle to grave, a treasure chest of government-supplied
benefits is there for the taking for every American citizen—and exercising
one's legal rights to these many blandishments is now part of the American way
of life. ...Citizens have become ever more broad-minded about the propriety of
tapping new sources of finance for supporting their appetite for more
entitlements. The taker mentality has thus ineluctably gravitated toward taking
from a pool of citizens who can offer no resistance to such schemes: the unborn
descendants of today's entitlement-seeking population. ...The U.S. is a very
wealthy society. If it so chooses, it has vast resources to squander. And
internationally, the dollar is still the world's reserve currency; there
remains great scope for financial abuse of that privilege. Such devices might
well postpone the day of fiscal judgment: not so the day of reckoning for
American character, which may be sacrificed long before the credibility of the U.S. economy.
Some would argue that it is an asset already wasting away before our very eyes.
—Mr. Eberstadt holds the Henry Wendt Chair in
Political Economy at the American Enterprise Institute. Excerpted from "A
Nation of Takers: The
No comments:
Post a Comment